Press "Enter" to skip to content

Two Obama Judges Who Sided With House DemocRats On Trump Financials To Get Bad News And You

Over the past week, two federal judges — both
of them appointed by the Left’s favorite president, Barack Obama — ruled last week
that POTUS Donald Trump and his family must turn over years’ worth of financial records
to angry House Democrats. The reason? “Oversight.” Democrats are in charge of the House now,
you see, and since Bob Mueller didn’t find any “Russian collusion” or real evidence
of “obstruction,” Democrats are now going all out to try and find something, anything,
they can hang around POTUS Trump’s neck to drive his support down so they can drive
him from office. What a mess our politics have become. In any event, as we reported, the first judge
to rule in favor of Dems, Amit Mehta, was a massive Obama supporter, as in, financially:
“Oh look, the Federal Judge who just ruled that President Trump must turn over his financial
records to Congressional Dems, also just so happens to be an Obama-Biden donor. I’m sure one has nothing to do with the
other though. Nothing to see here folks!” Oh look, the Federal Judge who just ruled
that President Trump must turn over his financial records to Congressional Dems, also just so
happens to be an Obama-Biden donor. I’m sure one has nothing to do with the other
though. Nothing to see here folks!
— Andrew Surabian twitted Surprise! If the Left had not so distorted our system
and it still functioned as designed, this hack judge would have recused himself because,
obviously, he’s compromised. But he didn’t because the Left will take
victory any way they can get it. Mehta’s ruling was just the first. As Politico reported:
A federal judge … allowed the House to move ahead with subpoenas seeking years of President
Donald Trump’s financial records from Deutsche Bank and Capital One, dealing the second blow
in a matter of days to Trump’s legal strategy of stonewalling Democrats’ mounting investigations. U.S. District Court Judge Edgardo Ramos rejected
a request by Trump and his family to block the subpoenas issued by Democrats on the House
Financial Services and Intelligence committees. The subpoenas seek documents including tax
returns, evidence of suspicious activity and, in the case of Deutsche Bank, any internal
communications regarding Trump and his ties to foreign individuals. Trump will challenge the ruling. “We will be filing a timely appeal with
the Second Circuit,” said Jay Sekulow, a personal attorney for the president. The ruling by Ramos, an Obama appointee, followed
a landmark decision on Monday by another federal judge, Amit Mehta, who said the House Oversight
Committee could proceed with a subpoena of Trump records held by accounting firm Mazars
USA. Trump is appealing that ruling as well. It’s good that the president is appealing. He should; it’s not just his business records
he’s trying to keep from being exposed/leaked by the pathetic Democrats who would rather
play political circus games than actually legislate. It’s the Executive Branch he’s trying
to protect. But when all of the dust settles and these
cases make their way to the Supreme Court, as is likely, the president has all of the
constitutional cards on his side, as it were. Yes, the House has subpoena power, but there
is nothing in the Constitution giving the Legislative Branch the power to
extort the head of the Executive Branch for records of any kind. And since the Constitution, not Jerrold Nadler
and Maxine Waters, is the final word on presidential requirements, we don’t expect New York State’s
BS law requiring all presidential candidates to reveal their tax returns before they can
be on the ballot to withstand a Supreme Court challenge, either. “The Democrats are hurling anything and
everything against the wall to see what sticks. They promised their base an impeachment fight
or at least a lurch towards it, and that chance to make a legitimate case was killed when
Robert Mueller said no collision occurred between the Trump team and the Kremlin,”
notes Matt Vespa at TownHall. No question about it. But should Democrats succeed here and the
president is forced to reveal personal financial information that has nothing at all to do
with anything, it will prove once again that Democrats overreach when they are angry, and
their next president (God forbid there is one) will be subjected to the same treatment
by Republicans. Meanwhile, the Independent voters who decide
most elections these days are watching this Democrat clown show with an eye towards the
2020 elections. And the trends are looking good for the president. Today’s poll Do you think Mueller report is not authentic??

One Comment

  1. Tony Meeks
    Tony Meeks May 29, 2019

    This is still part of the witch-hunt because the Democratic Party can’t find anything because it’s all a lie!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *